On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:26:43AM -0400, Radek Holy wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Kevin Fenzi" <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> > > To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 5:01:45 PM > > Subject: Re: dnf interactive config file updates > > > > On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:45:41 +0100 > > "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > I see that dnf has sprung apt-style configuration file messages: > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > $ sudo dnf install mingw32-srvany > > > Using metadata from Mon Apr 13 13:56:00 2015 (1:43:07 hours old) > > > Package mingw32-srvany-1.0-15.20150115gitfd659e77.fc23.noarch is > > > already installed, skipping. Dependencies resolved. > > > Nothing to do. > > > Configuration file '/etc/pam.d/fingerprint-auth' > > > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 19 Feb 21 > > > 2012 /etc/pam.d/fingerprint-auth -> fingerprint-auth-ac -rw-r--r--. 1 > > > root root 701 May 9 2012 /etc/pam.d/fingerprint-auth.rpmnew > > > > > > ==> Package distributor has shipped an updated version. > > > What would you like to do about it ? Your options are: > > > Y or I : install the package maintainer's version > > > N or O : keep your currently-installed version > > > D : show the differences between the versions > > > M : merge configuration files > > > Z : background this process to examine the situation > > > S : skip this file > > > The default action is to keep your current version. > > > *** aliases (Y/I/N/O/D/M/Z/S) [default=N] ? > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > In fact I _didn't_ change that file, so the message is wrong. > > > > > > I suspect we'll end up with Debian interactive installs, which as a > > > Debian user I find to be a regression. > > > > > > - 'dnf -y install' doesn't suppress the message. > > > > > > - In fact you cannot even kill it with ^C. You have to killall -9 > > > dnf. > > > > > > This happens on dozens of file now, every time I use dnf. Make it go > > > away! > > > > I suspect this is caused by the 'rpmconf' plugin ? > > Yes, correct. > > > sudo dnf remove python3-dnf-plugins-extras-rpmconf > > > > I agree it's behavior isn't good there. Bug(s) filed? > > Yes, please. Against the DNF's community plugins (dnf-plugins-extras), please. > > And can you please also immediately file a Bugzilla (if it does not exist) next time you hit a bug? I almost always do. But what's the bug here? The feature itself or the fact that -y doesn't make it go away? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows. http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
