On Mon, 2015-04-13 at 10:43 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2015-04-13 at 08:47 +0200, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > > Le dimanche 12 avril 2015 à 17:06 -0700, Adam Williamson a écrit : > > > > > > It's hard to see how you build a perfect dep check other than > > > trying > > > to solve the deps of *every single package in the distro* against > > > every proposed update. > > > > Can't we run repoclosure on (at the same time) the fedora repo, the > > updates repo, and a temporary repo made of the packages to be pushed? > > > > Repoclosure does check for the deps of every single package in the > > set > > of repos it is provided. > > Not sure offhand if we've looked into using repoclosure to check this, > but one obvious issue I can think of is, what if repoclosure isn't > clean *to start with*? Block all updates push until repoclosure gets cleaned? Of course, Bodhi admins would need to still be able to force pushes, to not block security updates or updates which fix repoclosure. Think of the incentive this would provide to fix broken deps! :) -- Mathieu -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
