On Tue, 2015-04-07 at 18:33 +0200, drago01 wrote: > On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > wrote: > > > > > > Am 07.04.2015 um 17:53 schrieb Ralf Corsepius: > > > > > > On 04/07/2015 05:07 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > > > > > dnf's default behavior is like yum with --skip-broken already. > > > > > > > > > WHAT? > > > > > > --skip-broken is a band-aid to work around packaging mistakes > > > and bugs > > > and NOT be the default. > > > > > > IMO, this kind of behavior is not helpful and therefore should > > > be reverted > > > > > > +1 > > > > that's unacceptable and leads in burry *real* problems resulting > > in sonner > > or later security updates are broken and nobody take snotice soon > > enough > > The bug is elsewhere though ... i.e. that is even possible to push > updates with broken deps. > Rawhide is a different story but everything that goes through bodhi > (stable releases and branched) should simply refuse pushes with > broken > deps. This is easier said than done. We don't have a perfect dependency checker and it's not at all easy to write one. tflink and John Dulaney have more details if you're interested, but yes, this is not a trivial thing we can just wave a wand and make happen. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
