Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/07/2015 06:09 PM, Tim Lauridsen wrote:


On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 at 17:54 Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx
<mailto:bruno@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 09:07:08 -0600,
       Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:kevin@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
     >
     >dnf's default behavior is like yum with --skip-broken already.

    Not when installing packages.

     >
     >If thats not working and you need to find out more, add '--best'
    to see
     >things without 'skip-broken'.

    My understanding is that --best can erase stuff (outside of obsoletes)
    and I don't want to do that in scripts.



afaik, --best don't erase stuff, you need --allowerasing for that

--best
    Try the best available package versions in transactions.
    Specifically during dnf upgrade, which by default skips over updates
    that can not be installed for dependency reasons, the switch forces
    DNF to only consider the latest packages and possibly fail giving a
    reason why the latest version can not be installed.

Pardon, folks - But haven't we been told dnf was supposed to be yum compatible?

I have to admit, I can't deny finding this kind of discussion to be very discurbing. They confirm my gut feelings about dnf is being not ready prime time and all recent decisions to make it default in mock and yum to be premature.




--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux