Re: Access to failed builds [Was: gcc5 ICE xserver build on ARM]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Feb 17, 2015 7:10 AM, "Peter Robinson" <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Indeed, reproducing the failures only to get a /tmp/ccXXXXXX.out file
> > is not exactly fun.
> >
> > In a related vein, I think ABRT should bundle the /tmp/ccXXXXXX.out
> > files to its reports as well.  From time to time we get reports as
> > <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189122>, but such a bug
> > report is largely useless without preprocessed source + command-line
> > options.
> >
> > Sorry if I'm driving this off-topic.
>
> Yes, the way to do that is to file a RFE in RHBZ against abrt, they
> are very responsive!

We should not include preprocessed source files by default without the user knowing and agreeing.  People use gcc to build proprietary source still.

josh

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux