On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 07:19:35AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Feb 17, 2015 7:10 AM, "Peter Robinson" <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Indeed, reproducing the failures only to get a /tmp/ccXXXXXX.out file > > > is not exactly fun. > > > > > > In a related vein, I think ABRT should bundle the /tmp/ccXXXXXX.out > > > files to its reports as well. From time to time we get reports as > > > <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189122>, but such a bug > > > report is largely useless without preprocessed source + command-line > > > options. > > > > > > Sorry if I'm driving this off-topic. > > > > Yes, the way to do that is to file a RFE in RHBZ against abrt, they > > are very responsive! Oh, we already have an RFE: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1139841 > We should not include preprocessed source files by default without the user > knowing and agreeing. People use gcc to build proprietary source still. That is a good point; the users would have to agree with sending the preprocessed file. Marek -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
