Re: npth (was: Re: Orphaning and seeking comaintainers of some packages)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:13:29 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:

> > nPth - The New Pth library : isn't that one of the forks of "pth" to be
> > developed more actively?
> >
> > It isn't used by any package yet according to repoquery.
> >
> > It has been imported just 23 months ago. Are you aware of any anything
> > that uses it?
> 
> Maybe you don't use rawhide?

True. It breaks my installations too often (and when I retry fedup, it
gives a 404 not found error, and I always forget the special invocation
or Wiki pages that may make it work).

But I could have pointed repoquery at rawhide.

> gnupg2 uses it for a long time.

Same author. ;-)

> You can query the dep info on rawhide
> machine, 3 packages need it: gnupg2, gnupg2-smime and npth-devel.

So, just gnupg2 so far, since gnupg2-smime is a subpkg, and npth-devel
belongs to npth (obviously). Okay. One should give it more time and
see whether any issues will come up during the F22 test cycle then.

> I still maintain it, but other maintainers especially of gnupg2 are welcome.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux