Re: Packages without the Rawhide branch?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 09:09:04 +0100
Matěj Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 2015-01-29, 01:29 GMT, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > I don't have numbers on how many packages have this need but I
> > predict that the efforts to get this to work, test it, deploy it,
> > etc. are vastly greater than the time saved not having to retire a
> > package :)
> 
> Certainly, but
> 
> a) we are geeks, so we want to have things Working Right™,

Sure. If I had the time to get every little thing working right, I
would sure love it. ;) Finding the time for corner cases is sometimes
difficult though. 

> b) when the work on pkgdb is open 
>    (https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5931) it is really 
>    not a big deal to add one more feature.

Sure, please feel free to suggest it in a ticket and/or help work to
make it happen. 

kevin

Attachment: pgpgZwYWjgnBE.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux