Re: DNF and mock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:11 +0100
Jan Zelený <jzeleny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 28. 1. 2015 at 11:52:54, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:01:44 -0700
> > Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > > On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 18:09:02 +0100
> > > Jan Zelený <jzeleny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 27. 1. 2015 at 10:03:54, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > On 27 January 2015 at 01:37, Jan Zelený <jzeleny@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ...snip...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > > > Does it mean that everything either migrated to Fedora or at
> > > > > > least considered
> > > > > > to be migrated soon?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > When you mean everything are you asking about web servers,
> > > > > database servers, email servers, etc?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Build servers
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Well, if we can get the ppc builders over to Fedora, then they
> > > would all be running Fedora. ;)
> > >
> > > That doesn't mean that mock on them will be using dnf by default
> > > however. That change would need to be made in koji (since it
> > > writes out the mock configs). Perhaps someone would be able to
> > > submit a koji patch around this?
> 
> I understand that and I will do my best to coordinate the effort
> here. I'm sure we will be able to provide some patches.

It is going to take quite a bit of thought and effort on how to best
integrate.  it is something I am planning to get on a roadmap for koji
2.0

> > > Also, I am not sure the status of releng tools with dnf. That
> > > would be pungi (makes images), mash (makes repos), generic releng
> > > scripts (at https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/releng/ ). All
> > > those may need work to move to dnf. (Some more trivial than
> > > others)
> > >
> > > kevin
> > 
> > The work to port the releng tools to dnf has not yet been started.
> > patches are welcome.
> 
> Actually, it has, at least to some degree. We work closely with Dan
> Mach and we already track a bunch of RFEs for hawkey. I don't know
> which tools are being worked on though, the only one I'm sure about
> is pungi.

Daniel Mach does not work with Fedora Releng at all. He has not
communicated to me nor has anyone else. As upstream for pungi and the
Fedora releng tools I think I am in a pretty good place to know where
the tools are. If someone is going off and doing something without
working with me then I am unaware of the work and look forward to
seeing patches submitted for review.

Dennis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUyrF7AAoJEH7ltONmPFDRocQP/03f6u/rCVfYcWN+RPP5zGMa
UTRbgJt7i0wZKML8bfdPu2kjNOih9qgQmxSh3L0zVYk+Roq5DGsarquULZ5VSaev
6DsQWrtMBehOq3uzFuGZXSCzYIuJ2+/lZuMOaxU2G1Tn1hAAvwO2gnjnRo+C7g9e
HmyODYUplZWcU6oTVZ0Alqf1Vl1wZHrZiW8S8xa9cFFP7o/oQ3/hIS3tgu6JPZ4z
uJ63PPrIm3cGpvp59MiisLgarpTuYmqSf+4gr1xuMIoYql+kq0dFxV0YfpaK3djo
e7yBruRaQI1XW4SxRy4B8b7DEMix3bvChcQulGDHf8YWgz3px7BMOYfG9Yp7pCRk
7gYQLcweXkMHDa7jGMUUfpup8g8nRq9lJT/iGV8ecadrN3mmfF9oT3S4MbIgj41f
McRw9PiHPlJnnepU9sSD7gxuMbtngH51DhzBfrrEetCMwJ0drD11LdoOvnRfnD/p
54qm0F12v0NxtD5szjm/12OwmKOBEWoDrcHKzrjvXBm685uzUzaNC6DmHIPHOkl3
a8e/iL4amds2DOPxG24XnSgxUq/FEQnJNhqR31/hiFDdGZIO+OTeAEm8Sk11D+G2
acl5eswlg4c8XkLG3erGeKNsliMuE9ovC7uI656z8MksmuIMn+WnZ81+cPw35stC
arotvnxiPSMxF0s+KEQq
=vKtY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux