>> > > > > > Does it mean that everything either migrated to Fedora or at >> > > > > > least considered >> > > > > > to be migrated soon? >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > When you mean everything are you asking about web servers, >> > > > > database servers, email servers, etc? >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Build servers >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Well, if we can get the ppc builders over to Fedora, then they >> > > would all be running Fedora. ;) >> > > >> > > That doesn't mean that mock on them will be using dnf by default >> > > however. That change would need to be made in koji (since it >> > > writes out the mock configs). Perhaps someone would be able to >> > > submit a koji patch around this? >> >> I understand that and I will do my best to coordinate the effort >> here. I'm sure we will be able to provide some patches. > > It is going to take quite a bit of thought and effort on how to best > integrate. it is something I am planning to get on a roadmap for koji > 2.0 > >> > > Also, I am not sure the status of releng tools with dnf. That >> > > would be pungi (makes images), mash (makes repos), generic releng >> > > scripts (at https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/releng/ ). All >> > > those may need work to move to dnf. (Some more trivial than >> > > others) >> > > >> > > kevin >> > >> > The work to port the releng tools to dnf has not yet been started. >> > patches are welcome. >> >> Actually, it has, at least to some degree. We work closely with Dan >> Mach and we already track a bunch of RFEs for hawkey. I don't know >> which tools are being worked on though, the only one I'm sure about >> is pungi. > > Daniel Mach does not work with Fedora Releng at all. He has not > communicated to me nor has anyone else. As upstream for pungi and the > Fedora releng tools I think I am in a pretty good place to know where > the tools are. If someone is going off and doing something without > working with me then I am unaware of the work and look forward to > seeing patches submitted for review. I would like to also point out that there is a Fedora build systems mailing list [1] where the discussions should happen and where patches should be sent for review. I've not seen any discussion, patches or anything else discussed there regarding any of the above. Peter [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/buildsys/2015-February/thread.html -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
