Re: Packages without the Rawhide branch?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 20:48:02 +0100
Matěj Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> this is a question which I have encountered couple of times, but 
> I have always forgot to ask about it: is it possible to have 
> a package without Rawhide (devel) branch?

Nope. 

> I have just created (and got approved) python-mako1.0 as 
> a compatibility package for EPEL-6. When I asked for the new 
> repo for it, I expect to get also devel/Rawhide branch for it.  
> However, I don't see any purpose of it. Should I just orphan the 
> devel branch of it? Or is there a way how to get a package 
> without it in the first place? Shouldn't it be possible?

Yes, just retire and add a dead.package the devel branch. 

There's no better way to do this currently.

kevin


Attachment: pgpw6LZlzzinY.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux