Re: Packages without the Rawhide branch?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2015-01-28, 21:10 GMT, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> I have just created (and got approved) python-mako1.0 as 
>> a compatibility package for EPEL-6. When I asked for the new 
>> repo for it, I expect to get also devel/Rawhide branch for it.  
>> However, I don't see any purpose of it. Should I just orphan the 
>> devel branch of it? Or is there a way how to get a package 
>> without it in the first place? Shouldn't it be possible?
>
> Yes, just retire and add a dead.package the devel branch. 
>
> There's no better way to do this currently.

And couldn't we make the script which builds the repos 
understand some syntax extension to do it? E.g., what about

    New Package SCM Request
    =======================
    Package Name: foo
    Short Description: fobricates bar
    Upstream URL: http://pkgname-project.org/pkgname
    Owners: jdoe
    Branches: el6 epel7 -devel
    InitialCC:

Perhaps it would do just the retirement of devel branch.

What about that?

Best,

Matěj

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux