On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2014-12-15 at 18:01 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Robert Marcano wrote: >> > I don't know why the time to rebuild rpms is important, updates are now >> > applied at boot time, so rpms can be rebuilt with smaller nice/ionice >> > before the user reboots (on Workstation product). >> >> Offline updates are only a (mis)feature of the GNOME "Workstation" product. >> The tools shipped by all the other spins (Apper, Yumex) do immediate updates >> as always. > > ...which brings this thread to the end of its useful life. To attempt to bring the discussion back to a useful state, would it make sense to have delta repo metadata? Re-downloading 20-ish MB of mostly unchanged package and file lists every day seems inefficient to me. (We'd hopefully implement that *once* and get dnf and PackageKit to use the same copy.) --Andy -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
