On Sunday, December 14, 2014 12:09:14 PM Hedayat Vatankhah wrote: > I'd call it evil. Apparently, nobody around here cares. I think I should > start thinking about my own "Fedora for Poor" product. It certainly affects me. Most decision are being made on two assumptions 1. people have fast and unlimited internet connections and 2. people have high RAM and multiple core CPU powerful computers. Both of these assumptions are arbitrarily at best. DNF regularly downloads cache, disables delta RPM support, and doesn't support local repos. Instead of implementing different profiles for different type of networks like wifi vs mobile we are throwing it out without people's consent. I am in favor of automation but it should be implemented when it's ready. -- Regards, Sudhir Khanger, sudhirkhanger.com, github.com/donniezazen, 5577 8CDB A059 085D 1D60 807F 8C00 45D9 F5EF C394.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
