Re: "Workstation" Product defaults to wide-open firewall

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/09/2014 04:04 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 01:25:47PM -0700, Pete Travis wrote:
On Dec 9, 2014 12:55 PM, "Reindl Harald" <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Am 09.12.2014 um 20:51 schrieb Pete Travis:

Hmm... a whitelist of things that are allowed to ask for firewall
accommodation doesn't help me develop new applications at all.  And
you're jumping to a really high level UI thing and just sort of hand
waving over the mechanism needed to make it all work.  Assigning
different networks to zones is a different problem compared to a program
asking for a port.


don't get me wrong but if it is too much asked for you to open a firewall
port i don't want to have your network-aware new application on my machines
or any machine working in networks i am responsible for

a prerequisite for develop network applications is understanding of
network basics and if your application don't use networking you are not
affected


--


Lets say I do have an understanding of network basics, just for the sake of
argument.  I share my application with you.  The application is intended to
listen on the network, you know this and want the application for that
purpose.  You run the application, it tries to listen to a network port.
Magick, prayers, and the ghost of Charles Babbage - or maybe some
hypothetical dbus service- does *something* to find out if you really
wanted that.  You did.  Neither one of us is is made incompetent by the
convenience.

Here's the thing: firewalld will let this happen.  at here is a dbus
interface.  Thomas has proven more than willing to accommodate RFEs. Nobody
is asking for changes that would solve the problem of frustrated users or
developers encountering firewall restrictions.  The GNOME folks don't want
the UX compromise of rote-clicked dialogs.  Nobody else is suggesting an
alternative implementation that actually *improves* the Fedora experience.
Ideas get more traction than complaints.

Gnome doesn't want a dialog.  What other choice is there then besides
1) remove firewall?  Because any other choice basically a convoluted
equivalent to #1.

When a user open the GNOME Share panel, detect running applications that have a .desktop file and non localhost open ports, list them there, check if ports are open, and let the user decide to open those ports that applications has actually listed there, No dialogs, using the same existing panel.

Much the same way notifications panel show actual applications, an option to open to all user session applications could be there that change the default firewalld zone

Just some ideas



--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux