Re: Improving the offline updates user experience

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 09/16/2014 04:02 PM, Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
> Dne 16.9.2014 v 17:29 Matthias Clasen napsal(a):
>> On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 16:21 +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Has Fedora given up Unix ??
>> 
>> This thread has gone quite far out into the weeds. It started
>> with a fairly concrete question: can we improve the offline
>> update experience by requiring only a single reboot, instead of
>> two ?
> 
> That's the core of the problem, while other systems have been
> trying for years to get rid of this nonsense (updates requiring
> reboots), we are moving the opposite direction. Technical reasons
> aside(*), this is NOT right for our users.
> 

While that may be a wonderfully ideal state to reach (and certainly
worth discussion), I agree with Matthias that this has gone far afield
of my original question.

I'd like to try to tie this thread back to answering a single
question: Without a fundamental redesign of the way things work, which
would be a VERY large and long-term effort, can we improve the user
experience for people *today* with fairly little effort?

If the answer to that question is "yes", is there anything
fundamentally wrong with adding that workaround while we solve the
situation in a more complete manner?

I think this is a great example of the adage "perfect is the enemy of
the good". We have a situation that everyone seems to agree is less
than ideal and we have two proposed solutions: one that probably
requires only a few weeks of work and testing and one that probably
requires a fundamental change to the way the system works and
therefore could take years to accomplish.

Ask yourself this question: are you as a user patient enough to wait
for a perfect solution or are you happy with incremental improvement?


> 
> (*) I agree offline updates are the safest way technically but
> that should be only regarded as a workaround for a more fundamental
> problem, lying deep below the desktop level.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iEYEARECAAYFAlQZe9kACgkQeiVVYja6o6N7LQCdHKJxoApCxamQgD65XW5tPYmz
n7oAniCMrdHSL36Zp6P/auCd9iF3h53f
=Ow2a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux