Re: Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 30.06.2014 19:06, schrieb Till Maas:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:54:42PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 05:55:41PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>>
>>>> As in many cases before, I once more have to disagree with you, because this
>>>
>>> Please refrain from personal attacks and note the Fedora code of
>>> conduct:
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
>>
>> Ralf didn't attack you personally or otherwise.  He disagreed with
>> you.  Disagreement is common place and honestly his phrasing was
>> perfectly acceptable.
> 
> If he just writes that he disagrees with me, I agree with you. But
> highlighting that he disagreed with me many times in the past is
> personal and has no relevance to whether or not comments should be added
> to patches in SPEC files.

but it remains *far away* from personal attacks
if people want to be insulted they will find a reason....

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux