Re: Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/11/2014 02:08 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 02:00:13AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
That was overly critical of me and did nothing to actually further the
discussion. I apologise.
No need to apologize! It's just the truth: ARM is not ready to be a primary

Kevin, I disagree. A positive tone to discussion is important even when
speaking the truth.

Matthew, in this case, I concur with Kevin. The facts are obvious and because of this obviousness, the tone should not matter at all, IMO.

It's time to *openly* discuss and to *seriously question* the arm's position in Fedora, even though such a discussion and/or the outcome should show to be unpleasant and/or undesired to some people/entities and their plans/interests.

Ralf


--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux