On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 01:53:12AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Matthew Garrett wrote: > > Eh. We're constrained by our own policies here, not by anything > > fundamental - LLVM being broken on ARM ought to mean that our ARM > > product is worse, not that everything else is dragged down to the same > > level. > > Didn't YOU vote for ARM as a primary architecture, and even actively lobby > for it? Now you get to pick the (poisoned) fruit… Er. No? I think you're confusing me with someone else. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
