On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 07:54:26AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 10:20:46PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 08:43:07PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > > Can we excludearch %{arm} for this one?
> >
> > Why? It's a bug that it doesn't build on ARM. Refusing to build it
> > doesn't fix the bug, and then someone else will crash into the same
> > issue when they dare to build something that needs llvm.
>
> It seems the alternative is hfsplus-tools doesn't work at all for
> anyone.
Eh. We're constrained by our own policies here, not by anything
fundamental - LLVM being broken on ARM ought to mean that our ARM
product is worse, not that everything else is dragged down to the same
level.
> BTW this package is also affected by the -fstack-protector-strong LLVM
> bug, but that is simple to work around.
Yeah that complaint is completely fair.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
