On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 06:00:05PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 05:23:01PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 03:45:57PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > Eh. We're constrained by our own policies here, not by anything
> > > fundamental - LLVM being broken on ARM ought to mean that our ARM
> > > product is worse, not that everything else is dragged down to the same
> > > level.
> >
> > So .. ExcludeArch %{arm} should be added? I'm not clear what you're
> > saying here.
>
> ExcludeArch implies that it's acceptable that it doesn't build on ARM
> and removes the incentive for anyone to fix it. It's not.
There's a process for handling this, which is to create (if required)
a Fedora bug for the package, and then attach it to this tracker:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=F-ExcludeArch-ARM
Then add ExcludeArch to the package, mentioning the particular bug.
I'm going to go ahead and do this now, since otherwise we won't have
hfsplus-tools at all for any user.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
