On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 05:23:01PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 03:45:57PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Eh. We're constrained by our own policies here, not by anything
> > fundamental - LLVM being broken on ARM ought to mean that our ARM
> > product is worse, not that everything else is dragged down to the same
> > level.
>
> So .. ExcludeArch %{arm} should be added? I'm not clear what you're
> saying here.
ExcludeArch implies that it's acceptable that it doesn't build on ARM
and removes the incentive for anyone to fix it. It's not.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
