Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday, June 2, 2014, 5:15:18 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:

> On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 16:52 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
>> On Monday, June 2, 2014, 10:05:22 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> > On Sat, 2014-05-31 at 10:33 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
>> >> Is  the  mga450 supported? Aside from formal graphics test days, I can
>> >> run whatever tests required on x86 (both 32-bit and 64-bit).
>> 
>> > Define "supported".  I believe for PowerPC in RHEL we build the matroxfb
>> > driver for this card, so that plus the fbdev driver for X is what you
>> > get there.  I'm not sure what would happen on Fedora for that, probably
>> > aligning it with RHEL makes sense.  On x86 you'd get vesa.
>> 
>> Assuming  there  are no down-sides of aligning Fedora and RHEL in this
>> area, it would be appreciated. Do you need a BZ to do this?

> Appears to be thus already actually, so no bug needed.

Excellent!  Thanks for checking.



-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux