Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2014-05-31 at 10:33 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:

> Is  the  mga450 supported? Aside from formal graphics test days, I can
> run whatever tests required on x86 (both 32-bit and 64-bit).

Define "supported".  I believe for PowerPC in RHEL we build the matroxfb
driver for this card, so that plus the fbdev driver for X is what you
get there.  I'm not sure what would happen on Fedora for that, probably
aligning it with RHEL makes sense.  On x86 you'd get vesa.

But in any of those cases there's no acceleration code involved, so
"supported" could reaally only mean "lights up and sets modes".

> I've  also got a GXT120 (OEM'd MY220P) and the identical x86 card. I'm
> not  sure  if  that  would  be  covered by "mgag200", but again, I can
> provide validation.

The mgag200 driver is, at the moment, only a driver for server variants
of the G200 (G200SE, G200WB, etc).  Actual G200, as well as G400 G450
and G550, are not driven by the mgag200 driver at this time.

- ajax

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux