On Monday, June 2, 2014, 10:05:22 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Sat, 2014-05-31 at 10:33 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote: >> Is the mga450 supported? Aside from formal graphics test days, I can >> run whatever tests required on x86 (both 32-bit and 64-bit). > Define "supported". I believe for PowerPC in RHEL we build the matroxfb > driver for this card, so that plus the fbdev driver for X is what you > get there. I'm not sure what would happen on Fedora for that, probably > aligning it with RHEL makes sense. On x86 you'd get vesa. Assuming there are no down-sides of aligning Fedora and RHEL in this area, it would be appreciated. Do you need a BZ to do this? > But in any of those cases there's no acceleration code involved, so > "supported" could reaally only mean "lights up and sets modes". Light is good. For the lower-functionality desktops, it is enough. The IBM AIX GXT135 driver documents a switch to enable minimally acceleration, but does not describe any details. Even without that enabled, it is usable under CDE. >> I've also got a GXT120 (OEM'd MY220P) and the identical x86 card. I'm >> not sure if that would be covered by "mgag200", but again, I can >> provide validation. > The mgag200 driver is, at the moment, only a driver for server variants > of the G200 (G200SE, G200WB, etc). Actual G200, as well as G400 G450 > and G550, are not driven by the mgag200 driver at this time. Thanks for the info, and your efforts! I can give them a try around alpha-time, and see what transpires. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
