Michael Scherer (misc@xxxxxxxx) said: > > For LSB, there is an explicit promise that if a vendor does what is > > specified, the package will be possible to install and will run > > correctly. We do, of course, have the option to repudiate LSB and > > explicitly say we don't care for future releases. > > So shouldn't redhat-lsb or some subpackage be the one that pull that > part ? redhat-lsb-core packages the standardized lsb init script functions; these source things from /etc/init.d/functions, but don't have an explicit requirement on that file. That should be fixed; then things can be moved wherever. It, of course, does not solve the problem that most random Red Hat/Fedora-specific SysV scripts out there source that file without any particular requirements, even if they are started by systemd. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
