Lukáš Nykrýn (lnykryn@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > >Also the sysctl stuff should be consumed by systemd: > >/usr/lib/sysctl.d/00-system.conf > >/etc/sysctl.conf > >/etc/sysctl.d/99-sysctl.conf > > > >Can we have a joint initscripts + systemd release in a few days to > >change ownership of those files? > > Sounds great. I will removed that from "upstream" and let you know. Historically, configuration like these (aside from the placeholders) are in initscripts because systemd didn't want to carry them - it's configuration that wasn't covered or was different from the upstream 50-default.conf. If the systemd maintainers are willing to have the Fedora default config different from upstream, then merging it makes sense. But shipping both 00-system.conf and 50-default.conf in one package doesn't make as much sense. > >>initscripts-doc > >>initscripts-locale > >>initscripts-man > > >I too think that this split is a lot of work for small gain. Working > >out the full dependencies set of what needs what is going to take a > >while, but I think it would be better to simply shrink the package to > >nothing in small steps. I really don't think we should do things like -locale, -doc, and -man at the inidivdual package level. It should be done at the distribution level automatically (vis-a-vis debuginfo), or not done at all. Doing it manually just leads to a potential for errors and inconsistency. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
