On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 03:51:48PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Lukáš Nykrýn (lnykryn@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > >Also the sysctl stuff should be consumed by systemd: > > >/usr/lib/sysctl.d/00-system.conf > > >/etc/sysctl.conf > > >/etc/sysctl.d/99-sysctl.conf > > > > > >Can we have a joint initscripts + systemd release in a few days to > > >change ownership of those files? > > > > Sounds great. I will removed that from "upstream" and let you know. > > Historically, configuration like these (aside from the placeholders) are in > initscripts because systemd didn't want to carry them - it's configuration > that wasn't covered or was different from the upstream 50-default.conf. If > the systemd maintainers are willing to have the Fedora default config > different from upstream, then merging it makes sense. But shipping both > 00-system.conf and 50-default.conf in one package doesn't make as much > sense. Currently it's just two "things": - shared segment limits, which are being raised in the kernel anyway [1], so hopefully they're just temporary - net.bridge.bridge-*, which are distribution policy really... This is small enough that I really don't see the problem with having in the systemd package. [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/115098 Zbyszek -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
