2014-04-24 18:13 GMT+02:00 Casey Dahlin <cdahlin@xxxxxxxxxx>:
Only those that are maintained directly inside Fedora.On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 05:55:29PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:I may be wrong but I believe we could update our dependency-detection scripts
> Hello,
> 2014-04-24 16:38 GMT+02:00 Lukáš Nykrýn <lnykryn@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > We must keep initscripts support, but I can imagine a setup where every
> > service uses a systemd unit, so this part does not have to be installed by
> > default, but could be pulled in as a dependency.
> >
>
> Are you sure? If you take an existing RPM that ships a sysv file, that's
> alone an indication that it probably hasn't been significantly reworked, so
> noone is likely to have added an explicit requires: on "this part". For
> extra credit, make sure that this works correctly with LSB-compliant RPMs
> that do nothing not required by LSB.
>
to note when a package ships an init script and add the requirement
automatically. As long as there's a mass rebuild between now and shipping that
should take care of everyone.
Mirek
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
