On 24 April 2014 02:49, Christian Schaller <cschalle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well my point is I spoke to Red Hat legal before I even posted the
original proposal to open up to more 3rd party repositories some
Months ago. There are a lot of repositories that it is perfectly
fine for Fedora to include from a legal perspective. But they will
need to be reviewed by legal on a case to case basis, going to legal
up front and saying 'hey can I include a hypothetical repository'
will only yield you the answer 'depends on the repository'.
OK cool. What is the plan for when repositories change what they are carrying and add stuff that may be legal for them but not for others? Will there be periodic reviews to make sure that this hasn't happened or some way that we roll back what repositories we recommend?
Stephen J Smoogen.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
