As far as two (or more) fedora-presets' being installed at once, I would say we allow the user to resolve the problem via .rpmnew The implication is "users would have to pick a -config/-preset package and then e.g. adjust things" This only works if the preset file has the same name across all the product lines. Thanks, -Jon On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Miloslav Trmač <mitr@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Colin Walters <walters@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Miloslav Trmač <mitr@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I think it's perfectly fine to have them conflict. >> >> You didn't reply to the part of my mail where I was describing the >> "Workstation on a Server" case. > > > Sorry, i read that as "Server on Workstation" which seemed really easy. The > opposite is indeed more difficult. > >> >> Are you saying that you do not believe this case is valid? Or that such >> users would have to pick a -config/-preset package and then e.g. adjust >> things so that gdm is enabled if they want that? > > > I'm leaning towards "yes" to both, but it's really not an easy call to make. > Mirek > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- -Jon -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
