On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 04:02:47PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > That seems reasonable, and in that case, something like "fedora-presets" > > and "fedora-workstation-presets", etc., seems appropriate, and the > > corresponding release package could pull them in. > What about my proposal to drop the preset directly onto the file system (but > in /etc rather than in /usr/share as we do now) in the live kickstarts? > After all, a file in /etc doesn't really need to be owned by some package. > (Having it unowned also means sysadmins can easily customize it by editing > it directly, as opposed to creating their own file in /etc.) I think in most caess, it's actually _nicer_ to create your own overrides file rather than editing a big monolith one, bceause with the monolithic approach you have to deal with merging changes in areas you didn't care about. I'm also not in favor of adding _more_ "canonical voodoo" to kickstart files -- that is, stuff which is effectively mandatory in every %post section. -- Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
