On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Colin Walters <walters@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Dennis Gilmore <dennis@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
i think limiting to systemd is wrong. maybe the package should be fedora-config-<foo> it could put other config snippets, or pull in packages for the experience of the product.1) We have to consider what happens when multiple of these things areinstalled simultaneously.
I think it's perfectly fine to have them conflict. We ship the product's default configuration in RPMs, we have never expected users to do all their configuration by RPMs. So a user would start with a fedora-config-<product> and then modify it manually,.
Mirek
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
