Re: Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- Original Message -----
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Matthew Miller < mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> wrote:
> 
> 
> I'd also like to see some of the restrictions on spins loosened a little
> bit. I think the spin/remix distinction (Fedora-only software vs. combined
> with other things) is good, but, for example, spins, maybe it *would* be
> okay to change software defaults in a way that isn't currently allowed.
> Is there a "way that isn't currently allowed" actually? Spins can put
> anything into %post, and some do modify configuration. (If nothing else, the
> desktop spins change the default desktop...)

And sendmail/rsyslog was one example. So yes, spin already do so. But stating
this formally/documented way would be worthy.

Jaroslav

> Mirek
> 
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux