On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 12:56:04PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > Yes but community products wont be considered "primary" products No. The initial plan calls for three primary *community* products. And we'll see where it goes from there. > which means if things continues in the same manner as "default" does > be ignored by QA/Releng/Marketing/Design since the focus will *only* > be on "primary" products. "Focus", yes. "Only", no. All of those groups help with existing spins to some degree now, and I don't see any particular change there. As I understand what you've said in earlier messages, I think you're strongly in the camp that thinks Fedora is best as a big bag of building blocks which we hand to users. Other people think that it would be best if we glued the blocks together into predesigned shapes. I think we can do the middle route, where we offer some pre-built structures but also keep the blocks available. Or to switch metaphors to the way Colin Walters put it in a message I read a few minutes ago , we *can* walk and chew gum at the same time. -- Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
