Re: Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 10:57:51AM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> >For that matter, there could be a "Fedora GNOME" spin distinct from the
> >Fedora Workstation product, if there were people really keen to work on it,
> >perhap as a showcase of upstream technology without worrying about the
> >concerns of the Fedora Workstation WG's particular area of focus. (With
> >"people keen to work on it" as the really key phrase.)
> But you cannot overlap products as in you cannot have a "Gnome
> workstation and "KDE workstation" etc you cannot have an "Server"
> product outside what is already defined in the ServerWG nor a
> "Cloud" product outside what is already defined there.

I think it's okay for there to be some overlap. The real world doesn't
always chop up into neat boxes. If there's a *lot* of overlap between two
nominally-different products, then that is less useful and it's probably
better for them to either work together or else find a stronger
differentiation.

But that's talking about products. As long as someone is interested in doing
them, spins can overlap like crazy.



-- 
Matthew Miller    --   Fedora Project    --    <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux