Chris Murphy wrote: > I think this is a good summary of what it's all about and what it isn't. > > https://www.happyassassin.net/2014/01/31/good-morning-bugfixing-and-thinking-about-fedora-next/ Yikes, one more step away from flexibility and towards a proprietary "one size fits it all" experience!? :-( You're a developer and you want your users to have a certain set of packages installed? Then you Require those packages! That's what RPMs are for! (And yes, this implies that you're supposed to actually PACKAGE your software. Or at least to let other people package it. People at certain third-party repositories are willing to package stuff even from binary tarballs, if only your license lets them! Heck, they even came up with hackish workarounds such as LPF for when the license DOESN'T let them, but they really shouldn't have to! But the right approach will always be to get your software INTO Fedora, with source code and under Fedora-compatible licensing terms.) Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
