Re: Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/30/2014 05:06 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi


On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:


    That being said, as we go forward as Fedora.NEXT, we start to see more
    clearly defined divisions between Products, Spins and Remixes. Since
    these discussions needed to happen, we (FESCo) felt it was best to try
    to move the conversation public.


Part of the problem I have with this discussion other than the alarmist
subject is that we are discussing the "fate of spins" before even coming
out with concrete products out of the fedora.next proposals.  That seems
premature.

+1

Until now, I am still unable to grasp the sense of "Fedora.NEXT".
All in all, to me all I've read so far sounds like being a lot of effort with undefined, unclear or questionable outcome.

Ralf


--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux