On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 11:17 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 06:45 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > QA does no testing of spins at all? If that's the case then I > > misunderstood. If QA does test, even if they don't block the release, > > it takes time and effort. > > No testing of spins is required on the part of QA. Sorry, nirik points out that I was assuming 'obvious' knowledge here that I shouldn't have: I meant 'non-blocking' spins. The two blocking spins - Desktop and KDE - obviously are tested by QA. Theoretically, therefore - *I STRESS THEORETICALLY!* - there is a case where changing spins reduces QA's workload, yes: by removing the obligation to test KDE. I personally like that KDE is a blocking desktop, but that's a personal opinion. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
