On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 16:33 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > I'd rather not confuse what is made from Fedora bits with what is > > based on Fedora bits but includes other bits. The remix branding does > > not seem appropriate for spins that are made purely from Fedora bits. > > That's fair. From a resource and quality perspective though, I'd > rather not burden rel-eng and QA with having to maintain, create, and > test spins. The 'burden' they create on QA is precisely zero, as we explicitly do not block releases on spins other than desktop and KDE. I don't believe releng considers the spins much of a burden, either - it's more just that they don't like building and pushing out stuff that no-one's even done a sanity check on. However, we have several high quality spins that people *do* care about and *do* test: at least the desktop spins, but I know for e.g. finalzone puts a lot of work into the design spin. I think it's fairly presumptuous to suggest chucking all that stuff in favour of something that doesn't even *exist* yet. > F20 improved spins overall, but that was because of a concerted effort > with our existing resources. If Fedora.next is going to succeed, > those resources are already going to be overwhelmed with the 3 > products. Again, there is no 'burden' on QA due to spins. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
