On 27 January 2014 13:06, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 01/27/2014 05:36 AM, Ian Malone wrote: >> does this mean there will be things unavailable on some 'products' >> that are not on others? > No. > > The Products will be defining an environment and a standard install > set. They may have separate initial *installation* repositories if > they need to provide different options to Anaconda, but beyond that > the intent is for all of the Products to continue to draw from the > same store of packages together. > > If (for example) we got ourselves into a situation where you couldn't > install Fedora Server and then also install the GNOME desktop > environment on that Server, this would be considered a major bug and > one that we would need to reconcile immediately. Cool. If I was to take this one step further then, an issue for Fedora Jam is we were limited in the customisations the could be made for a spin (e.g. defaulting users into certain groups to allow real time audio). While there's not enough of the developer base to make it an official product would there be a way to slot this into that framework? -- imalone http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct