Re: Fedora.next in 2014 -- Big Picture and Themes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 13:48 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:

> > To be honest my concerns are more with my user hat on than my contributor
> > hat - that we will lose the gold standard unified packaging standards and
> > single source and mechanism for installing packages.
> 
> I haven't seen anything from any WG that would suggest a deviation
> from RPM packaging guidelines or using separate repositories.  It is a
> valid concern and one we need to keep an eye on.

Um. As I read it, three out of four WGs - desktop, server, and cloud -
have at least discussed the possibility of implementing what are, in
essence, secondary package management layers. The details differ - 'app
bundles' for desktop, 'containers' or whatever for server and cloud -
but the effect is the same.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux