-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/27/2014 05:36 AM, Ian Malone wrote: > So without, unfortunately, the time to read through reams of stuff > on this and with my user hat on (don't think I've seen any > discussion of this on the users list), if it means how fedora > actually works is better thought out then that's a good thing, but > does this mean there will be things unavailable on some 'products' > that are not on others? At the minute you install a spin and can > add whatever other packages. That's great if you want to do > something like set up a quick web server for testing or stream some > music without creating VMs everywhere. It sounds a bit like this > plan may end up with finding you can't do X on a Fedora system > because you installed the wrong flavour. > No. The Products will be defining an environment and a standard install set. They may have separate initial *installation* repositories if they need to provide different options to Anaconda, but beyond that the intent is for all of the Products to continue to draw from the same store of packages together. If (for example) we got ourselves into a situation where you couldn't install Fedora Server and then also install the GNOME desktop environment on that Server, this would be considered a major bug and one that we would need to reconcile immediately. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlLmWdMACgkQeiVVYja6o6P0twCfRk46ssphyt3+iZUnbh/t4TrG +FEAoINANDTuTrd+jEY8rFLydsna8obW =bmho -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
