Re: Inter-WG coordination: Stable application runtimes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 11:00 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:

> So instead of the perenial "let's drop rpm and use upstream incomplete
> systems" 

You might note I didn't say that.

> I'd like to see the people working in those language communities
> work at adding the missing bits to those upstream systems so the mapping
> gets less incomplete and conversion can approach 1:1. That's the only way
> it can work: add the missing capabilities to the less-complete system.

Yes - but the first thing that needs to happen is for rpm/Fedora to
support consuming any upstream metadata *at all*.  Even if it was just
"rpm/Fedora will assume %prep can be run with just @buildsys, and run
through /usr/share/rpm/frameworks/{autotools.sh,ruby.rb} for scripts to
extract metadata from the source".






-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux