Adam Williamson wrote: > So to bring it to the context of Fedora.next - if some of the > 'Fedora.next' products want to have the capability to deploy 'stable', > i.e. bundled, stacks, then I think they should be 'allowed' to do so (in > the sense that we can't really stop them), but the mechanisms used to do > so should not be considered a part of the Fedora project, they should be > upstream projects that are deployed on top of Fedora. +1, I agree with Adam's assessment. Some level of pragmatism should be included in future/next plans, finding balance between ideal/reality will be fun(1) -- rex (1) fun, hard, painful, whatever. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
