Re: dnf versus yum

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/05/2014 11:53 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
where would it be useful to uninstall base-package and YUM/DNF itself
bringing your system in a non-recoverable state?

I already offered a couple of examples that you ignored (just a couple
that came to mind, certainly not an exhaustive list):

When will it be useful and correct to remove the *running* kernel (that is what yum protects you from doing)?

Yum also protects you from removing yum, 'Error: Trying to remove "yum", which is protected'. Is that bad also? As long as you have rpm installed you can download the yum rpm, and re-install yum, so why protects it? Could it be because yum has a user perspective, making it a tad harder for the non technically oriented user to do bad things to the system? Leaving the bad things to the more technically oriented user?

Lars
--
Lars E. Pettersson <lars@xxxxxxxx>
http://www.sm6rpz.se/
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux