Re: dnf versus yum

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 04:28:59PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> look like it starts to happen again: a replacement which is not ready
> 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2014-January/444565.html
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2014-January/444563.html
> 
> please realize that a drop-in replacement *first* needs to be *really*
> drop-in and not "somehow like", otherwise all the things you may make
> better are worthless

Why did you even bother posting this message, if not to dismiss the
hard work of people who actually do stuff, rather than spending all
day trolling?

DNF is a planned replacement (some time in the future).  Ales is quite
correctly asking for feedback and opening things up to a wider
userbase.  Some things don't work, as he is aware.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#)
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux