Re: dnf versus yum

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sent from my Google Nexus 5
On Jan 2, 2014 8:36 AM, "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 04:28:59PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > look like it starts to happen again: a replacement which is not ready
> >
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2014-January/444565.html
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2014-January/444563.html
> >
> > please realize that a drop-in replacement *first* needs to be *really*
> > drop-in and not "somehow like", otherwise all the things you may make
> > better are worthless
>
> Why did you even bother posting this message, if not to dismiss the
> hard work of people who actually do stuff, rather than spending all
> day trolling?
>
> DNF is a planned replacement (some time in the future).  Ales is quite
> correctly asking for feedback and opening things up to a wider
> userbase.  Some things don't work, as he is aware.
>
> Rich.
>

Aye. He is pretty on top of things in my experience with him.

I also don't see the point of this thread.

Dan

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux