Re: dnf versus yum

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



signed completely.

using fed since core, it makes me stupid, to rethink after every update. one system is deleted, cause it never was stable after an upgrade.

regards,

joern rink

Am 02.01.2014 17:01 schrieb "Reindl Harald" <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Am 02.01.2014 16:51, schrieb Richard Hughes:
> On 2 January 2014 15:28, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> look like it starts to happen again: a replacement which is not ready
>
> DNF isn't due to replace yum until F22.

which may arrive in 2014 givern that F20 was released 2013/12
that's why i start to complain *before* it is too late

>> please realize that a drop-in replacement *first* needs to be *really*
>> drop-in
>
> It's not a drop-in replacement.

and *that* is a problem. if something is going to replace a well
working and existing piece of software it should support it's
capabilities completly and before not be considered as release
quality

> This is my last email to this thread

calm down


--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux