-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/06/2013 09:57 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 15:38:10 +0100, Phil Knirsch > <pknirsch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> But i do like the idea of well "Overlap" releases? Where most of >> the release would stay stable in a sense of API/ABI and we could >> still bring out a newer release. > > Since we have a system where multiple kernel types can be > installed, maybe we could use that to have a latest stable kernel > package and a latest long term support kernel package. This will > take more kernel team resources and may have some issues if the > graphics drivers devs want to take advantage of a new feature that > isn't going to be back ported to stable. Alternately, maybe this is one of the cases where we leave it to RHEL/CentOS to cover. For really long-term kernel support, those groups are much better equipped to resource it than the Fedora kernel team. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlJ6ZD4ACgkQeiVVYja6o6MveACfbAcNcioMfV4R1cJfu9yu8kXD lHsAn3WH1RfEfSvFzVEKOjjegYybVxrZ =JnZM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
